Lremstam@itdemokrati.nu
www.itdemokrati.nu

DETECTIVE TIPS in serious criminal cases, murder
Olof Palme, The Palm Murder
3
Page 295

When Svensson is asked to describe the perpetrator, he states that he cannot say anything beyond what was mentioned during the interrogation that was held with him earlier. He has to add here that the man ran in such a way that indicates that he could not have been particularly old.

In other words, he ran relatively briskly. Svensson also points out that when he gave the description of the perpetrator during the previous interrogation, he had not read anything about this in the newspapers. He has now later reacted when he read that the perpetrator has been described as having a long jacket.

This does not match Svensson's memory. Svensson wants to remember that the man had a dark jacket, no more than 3/4 length. Svensson had also reacted because the man had been described as having a cap or similar on his head. This also does not match Svensson's memory, but Svensson believes that the man should instead have had dark hair and was bareheaded or that he was wearing a dark knitted hat.

Svensson saw the perpetrator during the time it took for him to run from the crime scene until he was obscured by the facade of the house on Tunnelgatan. The man ran the whole time. Svensson never saw the man's face in such a way that he could reproduce an image of him. Svensson had also not reacted because the man was particularly tall or particularly short, and therefore has difficulty stating any height at all for the man.

Svensson had not noticed any people around the scene of the crime except for the one he described as wearing a blue jacket. By that he means that he had not attached himself to people in cars that belong to the normal cityscape.
Svensson himself has nothing to add to the minutes, and he approves that this be written down as it was dictated onto the tape in his presence.
Pomovan
Paul Johansson
krinsp
In audible parts correctly transcribed it is certified:
Ulla Perhson