Introduction, the killing of Olof Palme


	Page 65 The Detective Page 66 Introduction Page 67 Contents Page 68 The bullet that hits Lisbeth Palme part 1 Page 69 The bullet that hits Lisbeth Palme part 2 Page 70 The bullet that hits Lisbeth Palme part 3 Page 71 The Place where the murder happened.. Page 72 Where to find the gun. Page 73 The postmortem record. Page 74 Frightening picture Page 75 Suspected gun man Page 76 Smith & Wesson Page 77 Justice, Solidarity & Equality


	Page 78 The Palme investigators Page 79 Tunnelgatan- Sveavägen The way it happened Page 80 The branch is broken Page 81 Olof Palmes tie part 1 Page 82 Olof Palmes tie part 2 Page 83 Blood spot part 1 Page 84 Blood spot part 2 Page 85 How a bullet is acting Page 86 It is windy Look at the movie Page 87 Lisbeth Palmes witness Page 88 All the author's witnesses


	Guestbook l.remstam@itdemokrati.nu itdemokrati.nu LR music


	Hits


	In Swedish

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Introduction

In war and president murder the police have nothing to say, in war the army do as politicians says, and in president murder the secrete police do as the politicians says. In both cases ordinary people don't understand what's happening, in both cases its good with technical evidence, for nobodies joy except for the history.

Technical evidence is good to have for 3 things.
1. Close suspected to crime scene.
2 Technical evidence that takes away suspected.
3. Technical evidence that can measure eye witnesses stories.
I'm going to try to reconstruct the murder with help from technical evidence and eye witnesses.


	Can we believe all witness or are someone talking to much. I believe Inge Morelius. If no technical evidence says he right then he should be lesser believed. But if technical evidence is on his side and on the same time tells that the police is wrong, he should be more trustworthy. 5 important things: 1. Where did the murder come from, where did he stand , before the assault. 2. How was he dressed. 3. How tall was he. 4. Gun, how did he shot, what angle, where should the bullet end. 5. What way did he run. This is what's it all about, in present time when Christer Pettersson is head suspected there is only 2 things that match: 3 and 5, there is only one thing that match with the PKK trace and it's NR 5 in Inge Morelius witness, what I'm going to do is to show you that he is right on NR 4 also. Questioning by the police 14/3 1986 F = Police Lars Borgström M = Morelius F. We take it one more time, the shooting act. You say he is heading the shoulder. M: As J saw from my point I thought he grabbed on him or spooked to him because he turned slowly around, and then it banged 2 times. F: Who turned around? M: The man who got killed, as I heard later, Olof Palme. F: You show me here that he turned to left? M: Yes as I saw he turned to left, but I was sitting between sixty to seventy meter away, I'm not to sure. Questioning by the police 8/4-86 11.50 Am F = Police Lars Hamrén M = Morelius F: In what direction did he have the gun, in what way did the gun point at? M: Slanting down, toward the victim. F: Slanting down, toward the victim and then, is it on your side of the street or inwards Tunnelgatan or? M: No, inn, shell we say slanting, yes, wait now I got to think. They stood, its got to be slanting in on Tunnelgatan on the other side from where I stood. F: Exactly. The side where the victim fell down. And on that side on, the right side or on the left side? M: Yes, shell we say from my point, toward the right side. F: Mm. What do you think the bullet should hit, if the victim wasn't there? M: J don't remember if it is a wall or a window but should I say 10-15 meter inwards Tunnelgatan F: Mm, in to the street or... M: Yes, as I saw, the bullet had hit the street.